The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT D.P. HEI, STEPHAN M. HUBIG,
and MATTHEW J. FINLEY
____________
Appeal 2006-3208
Application 10/097,232
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: September 11, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse and enter a new
ground of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
1 The application was filed March 12, 2002. The real party in interest is
Ecolab Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013