Ex Parte Harkness et al - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        


                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                 ___________                                                    
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ___________                                                    
                                Ex parte DAVID H. HARKNESS, DAOZHENG LU,                                        
                            WILLIAM A. FEININGER, and CRAIG M. SMITHPETERS                                      
                                                 ___________                                                    
                                             Appeal No. 2006-3231                                               
                                           Application No. 09/955,691                                           
                                             Technology Center 2600                                             
                                                 ___________                                                    
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                 ___________                                                    

                    Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
                    DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                             DECION ON APPEAL                                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final                
                rejection of claims 1-24, 26-33, and 48-50, which are all of the claims pending in this         
                application.                                                                                    

                We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                              

                                                BACKGROUND                                                      
                    Appellants’ invention relates to detection of media links in broadcast signals.  An         
                understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 10,         
                and 18, which are reproduced below.                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013