Appeal No. 2006-3231
Application No. 09/955,691
to access the Web site or content associated with the media link in order to discover the
identity of the program, or the program may be viewed by personnel of the central facility
28 in order to discover the identity of the program.” [Specification, p. 17, ll. 5-10].
[Emphasis added.]
Here we do not find that Appellants are claiming the automatic initiation of the link
to identify the program by the system, but that the media link may be used. Here, we find
that URLs of Killian may be used to identify the program to some degree as discussed
above. Therefore, the Examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness, and
we will sustain the rejection of dependent claim 18.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, we have affirmed the rejection of claims 1, 4, and 6 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102, and reversed the rejection of claims 5, 24, and 31-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 102,
affirmed the rejection of claims 2, 3, 7-23, 48, and 49 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and
reversed the rejection of claims 26-28, 30, and 50 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013