1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
9 ____________
10
11 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
12 AND INTERFERENCES
13 ____________
14
15 Ex parte Peng Tan1
16 ____________
17
18 Appeal 2006-3235
19 Reexamination Control 90/006,696
20 Patent 4,682,8572
21 Technology Center 2800
22 ____________
23
24 Decided: March 28, 2007
25
26 ____________
27
28
29 Before JOHN C. MARTIN, LEE E. BARRETT, and JAMESON LEE,
30 Administrative Patent Judges.
31
32
33
1 The appellant is the patent owner, inventor Peng Tan. This
reexamination proceeding was initiated at the request of a third-party
requester, Philips Intellectual Property & Standards (“Requester”). See
Request for Reexamination Transmittal Form, dated July 7, 2003.
2 Based on Application 06/718,866, filed April 2, 1985.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013