The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALBERT HÖGLUND, KIMMO HÄTÖNEN, and ANTTI SORVARI ____________ Appeal 2006-3245 Application 10/383,224 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 6, 2007 ___________ Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-10. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013