The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD, GUOHENG ZHAO,
and KALMAN KELE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-3247
Application No. 10/345,055
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: May 17, 2007
____________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP
and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-6, 10, 11, 13-17, 19, 20, 22-29,
31, 32, and 34-41. The Appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134(a). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013