Appeal No. 2006-3250 Page 5 Application No. 10/468,562 changed or modified in the microorganism.” Included among the various modifications contemplated by Appellants’ disclosure is deregulating the biosynthesis of pantothenic acid (pan) and/or isoleucine/valine (ilv) by “increasing the number of copies of the gene in the genome or by introducing a varying number of copies of plasmids.” Specification, page 8. The second step of Appellants’ process requires that the D-pantothenate- containing fermentation solution be passed through an anion exchanger, thereby binding the D-pantothenic acid to the anion exchanger. The third step of Appellants’ process requires that D-pantothenic acid be eluted from the anion exchanger. This step provides for two different methods of accomplishing this goal: (1) eluting D-pantothenic acid in the form of calcium and/or magnesium D-pantothenate by a solution containing inorganic or organic calcium salts and/or magnesium salts; or (2) eluting the bound D-pantothenate in the form of free D-pantothenic acid using an HCl solution. The final required step in Appellants’ process requires that the eluate be dried and/or formulated. According to the Examiner, the process outlined above, would have been prima facie obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made in view of the combination of Hikichi, Baigori, Binder and Hoffman-La Roche. It is clear from Appellants’ specification (bridging paragraph, pages 5-6), as well as Hikichi (column 3, lines 39-50), Baigori (page 4240), and Binder (column 1, lines 34-43) that a number of microorganisms are capable ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013