The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MUTSUMI MASUMOTO ____________ Appeal 2006-3286 Application 10/422,290 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: January 27, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 12 and 16 through 19, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of thinning a semiconductor wafer, where the wafer has two flat surfaces and aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013