Ex Parte Callol et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                 
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                             Ex parte JOSEPH R. CALLOL                                                         
                                                 and W. STAN WILSON                                                            
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                                    Appeal 2006-3287                                                           
                                                 Application 10/022,996                                                        
                                                 Technology Center 3700                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                                 Decided:  April 30, 2007                                                      
                                                      ____________                                                             
                  Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.                                                     
                  GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
                  KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-14.  Claim 8 is                               
                  illustrative:                                                                                                
                          8.  A method for treating the proximal portion of a main vessel and                                  
                  the opening of a side branch vessel at a bifurcation, comprising:                                            
                          providing a stent having a plurality of first rings and a plurality of                               
                  second rings;                                                                                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013