Ex Parte Emirze et al - Page 2



                  Appeal 2006-3304                                                                                             
                  Application 10/203,905                                                                                       

                  this appealed subject matter are set forth in representative independent claim                               
                  13 which reads as follows:                                                                                   
                          13.  A material, comprising:                                                                         
                          a microfilament nonwoven fabric having a mass per unit area of 40 to                                 
                  300 g/m2, the nonwoven fabric made from a melt-spun, drawn, multi-                                           
                  component endless filament having a titer of 1.5 to 5 dtex and directly laid                                 
                  down to form a fibrous web, the multi-component endless filament split at                                    
                  least to 80% to form micro-endless filaments having a titer of 0.1 to 1.2 dtex                               
                  and bonded;                                                                                                  
                          wherein the fabric is configured as a sound absorbing fabric.                                        
                          The references set forth below are relied upon by the Examiner as                                    
                  evidence of anticipation and/or obviousness:                                                                 
                  Groten US 5,899,785 May  4, 1999                                                                             
                  Nishijima US 5,965,084 Oct. 12, 1999                                                                         
                  Marmon US 6,200,669 B1 Mar. 13, 2001                                                                         
                          The following prior art rejections are before us on this appeal:                                     
                          Claims 13-19 and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 “(a and e) as                                 
                  being anticipated by Groten” (Answer 3).                                                                     
                          Claims 20 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                      
                  unpatentable over Groten, and claim 30 stands correspondingly rejected over                                  
                  this reference and further in view of Marmon.                                                                
                          Claims 13-21, 29, and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                    
                  being unpatentable over Marmon in view of Nishijima.                                                         
                          We refer to the Brief and Reply Brief as well as to the Answer for a                                 
                  complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by the Appellants                                   
                  and by the Examiner concerning the above-noted rejections.                                                   
                                                              2                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013