Ex Parte Isomura et al - Page 7



                Appeal 2006-3315                                                                              
                Application 10/309,321                                                                        

                Examiner’s § 103 rejections based on Abe as a primary reference.  On the                      
                other hand, the Examiner’s § 103 rejections of all the appealed claims based                  
                on Goldsmith as a primary reference are sustained.  Accordingly, the                          
                Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.                                
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                      
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2004).                         
                                                AFFIRMED                                                      
















                clj                                                                                           
                BURR & BROWN                                                                                  
                PO BOX 7068                                                                                   
                SYRACUSE NY 13261-7068                                                                        

                                                      7                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7

Last modified: September 9, 2013