Appeal 2006-3339
Application 10/869,805
indicated supra, Fig. 2D shows and claim 3 recites only one side being
folded prior to being overlapped. Accordingly, Appellant's argument fails to
convince us of error in the Examiner's rejection, and we will sustain the
rejection of claims 6 and 10.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 10 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). See 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013