Ex Parte Kinsman et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-3357                                                                                  
                Application 10/310,311                                                                            
                       Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a system for securing a                       
                semiconductor device in nonparallel relation to a carrier substrate.                              
                Independent claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention and reads as                       
                follows:                                                                                          
                              1. A system for securing at least one                                               
                              semiconductor device in nonparallel relation to a                                   
                              carrier substrate, comprising:                                                      
                                    at least one interconnection receptacle                                       
                              associated with the carrier substrate for receiving                                 
                              at least an edge portion of the at least one                                        
                              semiconductor device; and                                                           
                                    a mounting element, including:                                                
                                    at least one assembly member configured to                                    
                              couple to the at least one semiconductor device;                                    
                              and                                                                                 
                                    at least one retaining member configured to                                   
                              engage or be engaged by a complementary engager                                     
                              upon insertion of at least the edge portion of the at                               
                              least one semiconductor device into the at least one                                
                              interconnection receptacle.                                                         
                       The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of                                      
                unpatentability:                                                                                  
                Bellomo                   US 5,449,297                      Sep. 12, 1995                        
                Richards                  US 6,056,579                      May 02, 2000                         
                       Appellants seek review of the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20                          
                under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                       
                U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Bellomo alone or taken in view of                            
                Richards.                                                                                         
                       The Examiner provides reasoning in support of the rejection in the                         
                Answer (mailed June 28, 2005).  Appellants present opposing arguments in                          

                                                        2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013