Ex Parte Eastman et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                             Ex parte JAY M. EASTMAN, WILLIAM J. FOX,                                          
                             ROGER J. GREENWALD, KEVIN P. ROESSER,                                             
                                        and JAMES M. ZAVISLAN                                                  
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2006-3381                                                 
                                          Application 10/162,3171                                              
                                          Technology Center 2800                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: March 23, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                    

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,                                             
                and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   


                                                                                                              
                1 1   Application was filed on June 4, 2002.  Appellant claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of
                application 09/502,252, filed February 17, 2000, now U.S. Patent No. 6411434 and the benefit under 35
                U.S.C. § 119 of provisional patent application 60/120,534 filed February 17, 1999.  The real party in
                interest is Lucid, Inc. of Rochester, NY.                                                      




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013