1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was 2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. 3 4 5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 6 _____________ 7 8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 9 AND INTERFERENCES 10 _____________ 11 12 Ex parte ANDREW T. METZGER 13 _____________ 14 15 Appeal No. 2006-3390 16 Application No. 10/441,783 17 Technology Center 3600 18 ______________ 19 20 Decided: May 31, 2007 21 _______________ 22 22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, 23 23 Administrative Patent Judges. 24 25 25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. 26 27 28 29 DECISION ON APPEAL 30 31 The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 12, 13, 15 and 21. 32 The other pending claims, i.e., claims 9-11, 16, 17 and 20, stand allowable. 33 THE INVENTION 34 The Appellant claims a zipper slide formed as a single, unitary piece 35 (claims 1, 2, 5, 12, 13, 15) or a unitary piece (claim 21) with a zipper guard. 36 Claims 1 and 21 are illustrative:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013