Ex Parte Metzger - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-3390                                                                                                             
                Application 10/441,783                                                                                                       

           1            existing zipper slide.  Thus, staying within the object of Baroky (i.e.,                                             
           2            retrofitting a zipper guard to a zipper slide), it is clear that there is no                                         
           3            motivation to provide a single unitary zipper slide and guard, and that the                                          
           4            rejections of the claims involve hindsight reasoning.  [Br. 10]                                                      
           5                                                       * * *                                                                     
           6                     The obviousness rejection fails to address the fact that the Examiner’s                                     
           7            interpretation of Baroky would defeat the purpose of the reference.  Within                                          
           8            Baroky, it is clearly stated that “the object of the invention to provide a                                          
           9            separate, readily attachable guard suitable for retrofitting conventional slide                                      
          10            fasteners…”.  (Column 1, lines 25-27, emphasis added).  Throughout the                                               
          11            reference, this object is emphasized, and attachment of the two pieces is the                                        
          12            main focus of the reference.  [Reply Br. 4]                                                                          
          13                                                                                                                                 
          14            The determining of obviousness does not require staying within the object of                                         
          15    Baroky.  “The question is not whether the combination was obvious to the patentee                                            
          16    but whether the combination was obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the                                               
          17    art.”  KSR Int’l. Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S.Ct. 1727, 1742, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1397                                           
          18    (2007).  In making the obviousness determination one “can take account of the                                                
          19    inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would                                               
          20    employ.”  KSR, 127 S.Ct. at 1741, 82 USPQ2d at 1396.  “A person of ordinary                                                  
          21    skill is also a person of ordinary creativity, not an automaton.”  KSR, 127 S.Ct. at                                         
          22    1742, 82 USPQ2d at 1397.                                                                                                     
          23            Baroky’s disclosure of retrofitting conventional zipper sliders with a                                               
          24    separate, readily attachable guard to prevent the sliders from picking up or                                                 
          25    pinching adjacent fabric material (Baroky, col. 1, ll. 13-16, 25-27) would have led                                          
          26    one of ordinary skill in the art, through no more than ordinary creativity, to form                                          
          27    the slider and guard as one piece in newly-made zippers to avoid the cost and                                                
          28    processing step of making and attaching to the slider a separate guard piece.  The                                           
          29    Examiner has argued that Baroky would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to                                           
          30    form the slider and guard as one piece to provide “increased rigidity and strength                                           

                                                                     5                                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013