The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK B. KNUDSON,
TIMOTHY R. CONRAD and
JERRY C. GRIFFIN
____________
Appeal 2006-3401
Application 10/938,255
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: February 26, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's rejection
of claims 1, 2, 4, and 5. Claim 3 has been allowed. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013