Appeal 2006-3401 Application 10/938,255 they fail to comply with the enablement requirement set forth in the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. We hereby sustain, therefore, the Examiner's § 112, first paragraph, rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, and 5. The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept. 13, 2004). AFFIRMED cam MERCHANT & GOULD, PC P.O. Box 2903 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0903 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013