Ex Parte Knudson et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-3401                                                                                 
                Application 10/938,255                                                                           
                they fail to comply with the enablement requirement set forth in the first                       
                paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.                                                                    
                       We hereby sustain, therefore, the Examiner's § 112, first paragraph,                      
                rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, and 5.                                                              
                       The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.                                                 
                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                        
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept.                       
                13, 2004).                                                                                       
                                                 AFFIRMED                                                        











                cam                                                                                              

                MERCHANT & GOULD, PC                                                                             
                P.O. Box 2903                                                                                    
                Minneapolis, MN   55402-0903                                                                     







                                                       5                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5

Last modified: September 9, 2013