The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CLIFFORD S. BRUST and GARY EVANS
____________
Appeal 2006-3426
Application 10/189,814
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: March 12, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and
ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Brust and Evans (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 11 through 27, and 30.
Claims 28 and 28 have been indicated as being allowable, and claims 8
through 10 have been indicated as being allowable if rewritten in
independent form.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013