Ex Parte Brust et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-3426                                                                                 
                Application 10/189,814                                                                           

                       Appellants' invention relates to a method of presenting flight path                       
                information for an aircraft in a three-dimensional airspace display.  Claim 1                    
                is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                               
                       1.  A method of presenting flight path information for an aircraft in a                   
                       three-dimensional airspace display, said method comprising the steps                      
                       of receiving flight plan data, receiving aircraft performance data,                       
                       processing the data to form selected flight path data, generating first                   
                       and second symbols in response to the selected flight path data, the                      
                       first symbols showing boundaries around the selected flight path, the                     
                       second symbols following the selected flight path, and displaying the                     
                       first and second symbols in a three dimensional airspace.                                 
                       The prior art reference of record relied upon by the Examiner in                          
                rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                
                Kubbat US 5,420,582 May 30, 1995                                                                 
                       Claims 1 through 7, 11 through 27, and 30 stand rejected under                            
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kubbat.                                               
                       We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed March 1, 2006) and to                           
                Appellants' Brief (filed December 5, 2005) and Reply Brief (filed March 20,                      
                2006) for the respective arguments.                                                              

                                         SUMMARY OF DECISION                                                     
                       As a consequence of our review, we will affirm the anticipation                           
                rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 11 through 27 and reverse the                                
                anticipation rejection of claim 30.                                                              






                                                       2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013