The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID P. HANNUM and ROHIT BHATIA
____________
Appeal 2006-3434
Application 10/687,907
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: March 13, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, JOSEPH L. DIXON,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1
through 3, 6 through 13, and 16 through 19 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013