Ex Parte Choi - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                                               ____________                                                  
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte BYEONG-DAE CHOI                                               
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0037                                                
                                          Application 10/032,0561                                            
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: March 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and                                                  
                JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final                   
                Rejection of claims 1-14.  Claim 15 has been canceled.  Claims 16-19 are                     
                withdrawn pursuant to a restriction requirement.                                             
                      We affirm.                                                                             
                                                                                                            
                      1  Application filed December 31, 2001, entitled "Array Substrate for                  
                a Liquid Crystal Display Device and Method of Manufacturing the Same,"                       
                which claims the foreign filing priority benefit of Republic of Korea                        
                Application 2001-2971, filed January 18, 2001.                                               



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013