Ex Parte Tyrrell et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                   Ex parte DAVID JOHN TYRRELL, CHANTEL SPRING BUHROW,                                        
                         DAVID ROLAND OTTS, DUANE GERARD KRZYSIK,                                             
                            EARL DAVID BROCK, JAMES LOUIS CAHALL,                                             
                                       and SAMUEL QCHENG LIN                                                  
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0042                                                 
                                          Application 09/746,880                                              
                                          Technology Center 3700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: April 23, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   


                Before CHUNG K. PAK, TERRY J. OWENS, and THOMAS A. WALTZ,                                     
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 

                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                          
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, 8-15, 20-29, 32-35, 40, 41,                 
                43, 45-47, and 49-56.  Claims 6, 7, 16-19, 30, 31, 36-39, 42, 44, and 48                      




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013