The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID JOHN TYRRELL, CHANTEL SPRING BUHROW, DAVID ROLAND OTTS, DUANE GERARD KRZYSIK, EARL DAVID BROCK, JAMES LOUIS CAHALL, and SAMUEL QCHENG LIN ____________ Appeal 2007-0042 Application 09/746,880 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: April 23, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, TERRY J. OWENS, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, 8-15, 20-29, 32-35, 40, 41, 43, 45-47, and 49-56. Claims 6, 7, 16-19, 30, 31, 36-39, 42, 44, and 48Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013