Ex Parte Patterson - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-0052                                                                                        
                 Application 10/438,053                                                                                  
                 objected to as depending from rejected claims.  No other claims are pending.                            
                 We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2002).                                       
                        Appellant’s claimed invention is directed to a device used for                                   
                 improving the putting stroke of a golfer.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the                               
                 claimed invention and reads as follows:                                                                 
                                1. A golf putting practice device comprising;                                            
                                       a) a disc;                                                                        
                                       b)  said disc having an annular top                                               
                                portion and an annular bottom portion;                                                   
                                       c)  said annular top portion having a top                                         
                                edge and said annular bottom portion having a                                            
                                bottom edge;                                                                             
                                       d)   said annular top and bottom portion                                          
                                forming an outer annular peripheral edge;                                                
                                       e)  said disc having a central opening                                            
                                extending through from said top edge to said                                             
                                bottom edge;                                                                             
                                       f)  said central opening at said top edge                                         
                                having a diameter substantially greater than said                                        
                                central opening at said bottom edge; and                                                 
                                       g)  said outer annular peripheral edge                                            
                                projecting between said bottom edge and said top                                         
                                edge and spaced a substantial distance from said                                         
                                top and bottom edges.                                                                    
                        The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of                                            
                 unpatentability:                                                                                        
                 Johnsen   US 6,279,245 B1  Aug. 28, 2001                                                                





                                                           2                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013