Ex Parte Droog et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                              __________________                                             
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                              __________________                                             
                      Ex parte THOMAS W. DROOG, STEPHEN A. WITHINGTON                                        
                                       and DOUGLAS GREENING                                                  
                                              __________________                                             
                                             Appeal 2007-0062                                                
                                          Application 10/706,7971                                            
                                          Technology Center 3700                                             
                                               ________________                                              
                                            Decided: August 31, 2007                                         
                                               ________________                                              
                Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and                                          
                JAMES T. MOORE Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
           1          A.  Statement of the Case                                                              
           2          Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                      
           3    claims 48-51 and 58-60.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                        


                                                                                                            
                1   Application for patent filed 12 November 2003.  The real party in interest               
                is Boss Packaging Inc.                                                                       



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013