Ex Parte Droog et al - Page 12



                Appeal 2007-0062                                                                             
                Application 10/706,797                                                                       

           1          E.  Decision                                                                           
           2          Upon consideration of the record, and for the reasons given, the                       
           3    Examiner’s rejections are affirmed.                                                          
           4          The Examiner’s rejection of claims 48-51 and 58-60 as being                            
           5    unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is affirmed.                             
           6          The Examiner’s rejection of claims 48-51 and 58-60 as being                            
           7    anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) by Gates is affirmed.                                     
           8                                                                                                 
                                                AFFIRMED                                                     





                hlj                                                                                          

                cc:                                                                                          

                Collard & Roe                                                                                
                1077 Northern Boulevard                                                                      
                Roslyn, NY  11576                                                                            






                                                     12                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12

Last modified: September 9, 2013