Ex Parte Tatsukawa - Page 6


              Appeal No. 2007-0067                                                                  
              Application No. 10/202,097                                                            

              Kawabe teaches that the speed profile between X1 and X2 is preferably                 
              linear (although other profiles are contemplated) and that numerous points            
              between may be calculated.  See column 6, lines 31 through 40.  Thus, we              
              find that Kawabe teaches a system which controls speed and position of the            
              valve.                                                                                
                    Kawasaki teaches a control system for a valve.  The control system              
              operates the valve to move to a set position to obtain a desired flow through         
              the valve.  The actual flow is also measured and the valve set position is            
              adjusted if there is a discrepancy between measured and actual flow.  See             
              column 3, line 64- column 4, line 6.  Kawasaki also teaches that the set point        
              that represents whether the valve is closed is adjusted if there is a                 
              discrepancy in the determination of whether the valve is closed, i.e. a new           
              closed point is learned.                                                              
                                            Principles of Law                                       
                    Office personnel must rely on Appellants’ disclosure to properly                
              determine the meaning of the terms used in the claims.  Markman v.                    
              Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F3d 967, 980, 34 USPQ2d 1321, 1330 (Fed.               
              Cir. 1995). “[I]nterpreting what is meant by a word in a claim ‘is not to be          
              confused with adding an extraneous limitation appearing in the specification,         
              which is improper.’” (emphasis original)  In re Cruciferous Sprout                    
              Litigation, 301 F.3d 1343, 1348,  64 USPQ2d 1202, 1205, (Fed. Cir. 2002)              
              (citing Intervet America Inc v. Kee-Vet Laboratories Inc., 12 USPQ2d 1474,            
              1476 (Fed. Cir. 1989).  It is the burden of the Examiner to                           



                                                 6                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013