Ex Parte Harland et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No.  2007-0079                                                        Page 2                  
                 Application No.  10/159,749                                                                          
                               measuring a resultant reduction of said morphogen-dependent                            
                           bone formation.                                                                            
                        The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                               
                 Tischer et al. (Tischer)  5,194,596   Mar. 16, 1993                                                  
                 Kopchick et al. (Kopchick)  5,350,836   Sep. 27, 1994                                                
                 Harland et al. (Harland)  6,432,410   Aug. 13, 2002                                                  
                 Vukicevic et al. (Vukicevic), “Induction of nephrogenic mesenchyme by                                
                 osteogenic protein 1 (bone morphogenetic protein 7),” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.                         
                 USA, Vol. 93, pp. 9021-9026 (1996)                                                                   
                 Skolnick et al. (Skolnick), “From genes to protein structure and function: novel                     
                 applications of computational approaches in the genomic era,” Trends in Biotech,                     
                 Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 34-39 (2000)                                                                     

                                            GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                      
                        Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                          
                 lacking adequate written descriptive support.                                                        
                        Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                          
                 containing new matter which is not supported by the disclosure.                                      
                        Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, on the                      
                 basis that the specification does not enable those skilled in the art to practice the                
                 full scope of the claimed method without undue experimentation.                                      
                        We reverse.                                                                                   


                                                   DISCUSSION                                                         
                 Written Description:                                                                                 
                        The examiner begins by directing attention to United States Patent No.                        
                 6,432,410 (Harland) to which the present application is a continuation.  Answer,                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013