The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HELMUT MANGOLD, RAINER GOLCHERT and ROLAND SCHILLING ____________ Appeal 2007-0088 Application 10/191,297 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: May 21, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL We AFFIRM. This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-4. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013