Appeal 2007-0088
Application 10/191,297
obtain and compare prior art products. See In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252,
1255-56, 195 USPQ 430, 433-34 (CCPA 1977).
In light of the foregoing and for the reasons set forth in the Answer,
we hereby sustain the § 103 rejection of claims 1-4 as being unpatentable
over Mangold in view of Berkey.
The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept.
13, 2004).
AFFIRMED
cam
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL
1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013