Ex Parte Tsuga - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0096                                                                                 
                Application 09/969,467                                                                           
                       Appellant’s invention is directed to a method for removing photoresist                    
                (an organic substance) from a semiconductor wafer using vapor obtained                           
                from ultrapure water.  The vapor is blown at an elevated temperature onto a                      
                surface of the wafer.  The vapor is irradiated with ultraviolet (UV) rays                        
                resulting in an increase in hydroxyl radicals.  Claim 1 is illustrative and                      
                reproduced below:                                                                                
                       1.  A method for cleaning a photoresist or an organic substance from a                    
                semiconductor wafer, consisting essentially of:                                                  
                       generating vapor by heating ultrapure water;                                              
                       increasing the number of hydroxyl radials in the vapor by irradiating                     
                ultraviolet rays into the vapor; and                                                             
                       removing an organic substance from said semiconductor wafer surface                       
                by blowing the vapor at a temperature of 85ēC or higher onto the                                 
                semiconductor wafer surface.                                                                     
                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                     
                in rejecting the appealed claims:                                                                
                Pokharna    US 6,596,343 B1  July 22, 2003                                                       
                Miki     US 6,610,168 B1  Aug. 26, 2003                                                          
                       Claims 1, 3-6, and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                     
                unpatentable over Miki in view of Pokharna.  Appellant argues the appealed                       
                claims together as a group.  Thus, we select claim 1 as representative of the                    
                appealed claims in deciding this appeal.                                                         
                       The Examiner has determined that Miki teaches “generating steam/                          
                vapor by heating ultrapure water (col. 2, lines 34-36)” and spraying/blowing                     
                steam/water vapor at a temperature of 75-85° C onto the semiconductor                            
                substrate/wafer surface to peel/remove photoresist (col. 12, lines 1-5).”                        

                                                       2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013