The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HORST MARTIN RECHELBACHER
____________
Appeal 2007-0122
Application 10/358,626
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 2, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 4-10 and 21. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013