Appeal 2007-0122 Application 10/358,626 with the deformable grip as claimed and Appellant has not sufficiently shown a long-felt need in the art to support a conclusion of non-obviousness. IV. DECISION Because a totality of the evidence supports a conclusion of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), we AFFIRM the decision of the Examiner. V. TIME PERIOD FOR RESPONSE No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal maybe extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED sld/ls THE ESTEE LAUDER COS, INC. 155 PINELAWN ROAD STE 3455 MELVILLE, NY 11747 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013