The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALBERT E. ORTEGA and R. WAYNE THOMLEY ____________ Appeal 2007-0141 Application 10/654,324 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: March 23, 2007 ____________ Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 7-16, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Appellants’ invention relates to an improved process for producing a nonwoven nylon fabric. The process is said to provide a softer hand orPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013