The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MIROSLAV TRAJKOVIC,
VASANTH PHILOMIN,
and SRINIVAS GUTTA
____________
Appeal 2007-0145
Application 10/183,7971
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: April 12, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and
JOSEPH L. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 1-27. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
1 Application for patent filed June 27, 2002, entitled "Active Window
Switcher."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013