The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN NEUSHUL
____________
Appeal 2007-0156
Application 10/386,326
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: August 30, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1, 6, and 10. Claim 7 has been canceled, and claims 2-5, 8, 9, and
11-13 have been indicated by the Examiner to contain allowable subject
matter. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013