Appeal 2007-0156
Application 10/386,326
CONCLUSION
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
rejection of all the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the
Examiner rejecting claims 1, 6, and 10 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
rwk
BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN
1279 OAKMEAD PARKWAY
SUNNYVALE CA 94085-4040
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013