Ex Parte Grossklaus et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                Ex parte WARREN D. GROSSKLAUS, JR.                                           
                                                    and                                                      
                                         MATTHEW N. MILLER                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-0164                                                
                                          Application 10/286,122                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                        Decided:  January 11, 2007                                           
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                              
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-19.  Claim 1 is                 
                illustrative:                                                                                
                      1.  A method for repairing a stationary shroud of a gas turbine engine,                
                comprising the steps of:                                                                     
                      furnishing the stationary shroud that has previously been in service,                  
                wherein the stationary shroud is made of a base metal;                                       
                                                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013