Ex Parte Bolster - Page 13

                Appeal 2007-0195                                                                             
                Application 10/895,515                                                                       
                                                SUMMARY                                                      
                      The decision of the Examiner is affirmed-in-part.  Specifically,                       
                decision is affirmed with respect to the rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 11-               
                16, 18, 20, and 21 as anticipated by Liveoak and reversed as to the rejection                
                of claims 4, 9, 17, and 19 as unpatentable over Liveoak in view of                           
                Richmond.                                                                                    
                No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                           
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).  See 37 C.F.R.                       
                § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).                                                                    
                                          AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                                   







                JRG                                                                                          


                GANZ LAW, P.C.                                                                               
                P. O. BOX 2200                                                                               
                HILLSBORO, OR 97123                                                                          








                                                     13                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13

Last modified: September 9, 2013