The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES DUNMAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0293
Application 10/630,982
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 28, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s non-final
rejection of claims 1 through 11 and 13 through 20, which are the only
claims pending in this application (see the Office action dated Nov. 21,
2005). Although the Examiner’s rejection was not made final, we have
jurisdiction since the claims have been twice examined and rejected. See
Ex parte Lemoine, 46 USPQ2d 1420, 1423 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1998);
35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013