Appeal 2007-0303
Application 10/348,101
and the prior art optimum resided within the range). Because In re Boesch
involved overlapping ranges, it is inapposite to the facts of this appeal.
The decision of the Examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
clj
Hammer & Hanf, PC
3125 Springbank Lane
Suite G
Charlotte, NC 28226
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3
Last modified: September 9, 2013