1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte SCOTT C. HARRIS
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0325
15 Application 09/780,248
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: April 16, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before ROBERT E. NAPPI, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
22 Administrative Patent Judges.
23
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28 STATEMENT OF CASE
29 This appeal involves a final rejection of claims 5-7, 9-11, 15-30, 32, and 331.
30 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
31
1 Claims 1-4 are withdrawn from consideration following restriction. Claims 8 and
12-14 are cancelled. The Examiner has no rejection against claim 31, although it is
among those claims subjected to a new ground of rejection in this decision.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013