Appeal 2007-0333
Application 09/966,802
scope and breadth of the term, we conclude that Sakata’s filter is capable of
inaudibly switching a filter as claimed – at least to some persons.
For at least the above reasons, we will sustain the Examiner’s
rejection of claim 22.
DECISION
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejection with respect
to all claims on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 7,
13, and 19-22 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2004).
AFFIRMED
rwk
GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, PLLC
C/O PORTFOLIO IP
PO BOX 52050
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013