Appeal No. 2007-0360 Page 2 Application No. 11/050,001 known to impart a fabric-softening benefit to the laundered fabric. Id. at 1: 20 to 2:6. “[P]olydimethylsiloxane is the preferred silicone component for incorporation into a solid particulate laundry detergent composition to provide a fabric-softening benefit.” Id. at 2: 33-34. “However, the unsubstituted nature of the polydimethylsiloxane also means that it is a highly hydrophobic material. In addition, the polydimethylsiloxane is in the form of a fluid at ambient conditions, and cannot simply be dry-added to a solid particulate laundry detergent composition; a suitable solid carrier material must be used. Clay is the most highly preferred solid carrier material for polydimethylsiloxane.” Id. at 3: 5-9. “However, due to the very high hydrophobic nature of the polydimethylsiloxane, when the polydimethylsiloxane is admixed with a clay, the resultant particulate admixture is rendered hydrophobic, which leads to a poor fabric-softening profile.” Id. at 3: 11-14. With this as background, Appellants conclude: “The Inventors have surprisingly found that both polydimethylsiloxane and clay can be admixed together and incorporated into a solid particulate laundry detergent composition to provide a good fabric softening performance by selectively modifying the amounts of other specific components that need to be present in the composition.” Id. at 3: 16-20. DISCUSSION Claims 1-17 and 19-26, all the pending claims, are on appeal. Br. 2. All the claims are rejected over the same prior art reference. Br. 5. Appellants have provided separate arguments for the patentability of the following groups of claims: 1) claims 1-9, 12-16, and 19-24; 2) claim 10; 3) claim 11; and 4) claims 17, 25, and 26. We address each grouping separately.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013