Ex Parte Graydon et al - Page 6

             Appeal No. 2007-0360                                                           Page 6             
             Application No. 11/050,001                                                                        

             Br. 7-8.  For this reason, Appellants contend that “pre-emulsified form” is not a                 
             product-by-process limitation.  Id. at 8.                                                         
                   “[W]hen the PTO shows sound basis for believing that the products of the                    
             applicant and the prior art are the same, the applicant has the burden of showing                 
             that they are not.”  In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed.                   
             Cir. 1990).  In our view, it was reasonable for the Examiner to infer that the                    
             claimed “solid particulate laundry detergent” would not contain the PDMS in a                     
             “pre-emulsified form.”  Answer 5.  According to the specification, “pre-                          
             emulsified” means “that the silicone is in the form of an emulsion when it is                     
             admixed to the clay during the process of preparing the particulate admixture.”                   
             Specification 6: 27-29.  An “emulsion” is a liquid.2  The Examiner states that                    
             “[t]he product is a granular solid; in the absence of a liquid phase, no emulsion is              
             possible, and the final product appears to be no different from the products of the               
             prior art.”  Answer 5.  Appellants did not offer any explanation as to how an                     
             emulsion would be possible in the claimed “solid particulate” composition.                        
             Moreover, we can find no statement in the specification that the emulsion would,                  
             in fact, still exist when the PDMS is processed into its final solid particulate form.            
                   Appellants argue:                                                                           
                   The inventors have surprisingly found that both polydimethylsiloxane                        
                   and clay can be admixed together and incorporated into a solid                              
                   particulate laundry detergent composition to provide a good fabric-                         
                   softening performance by using a pre-emulsified form of                                     
                   polydimethylsiloxane and by selectively modifying the amounts of the                        
                   specific components in the detergent composition (page 3, lines 5-20                        
                   and page 6, lines 25-27).  Accordingly, the use of pre-emulsified form                      
                   of polydimethylsiloxane in the detergent composition is not [a]                             
                   product-by-process claim limitation because it is essential for not only                    
                   admixing the polydimethylsiloxane and clay but also provides the                            
                                                                                                              
             2 “[A] liquid preparation . . .”  Random House Dictionary 434 (1975).                             



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013