The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FELIX A. STREIFF
______________
Appeal 2007-0380
Reexamination Control 90/007,199
Patent 6,394,644 B1
Technology Center 1700
__________
Decided: June 15, 2007
__________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, ROMULO H. DELMENDO, and
SALLY G. LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Statement of the case
The patent under reexamination is US Patent 6,394,644 B1, issued on
28 May 2002 from Application 09/596,499, filed 19 June 2000. (‘644
Patent).1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 306.
1 The real party in interest is said to be Sulzer Chemtech AG (Br. 3).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013