Appeal 2007-0394
Application 09/769,036
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
We conclude that Appellants have not shown that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 13, 26, and 29 as unpatentable over Wagner and
Hawkins, claims 8, 12, and 30 as unpatentable over Wagner, Hawkins, and Harada,
and claims 21, 22, 24, and 25 as unpatentable over Hawkins and Harada.
DECISION
The Examiner’s decision under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) to reject claims 3, 4, 6, 7,
11, 13, 26, and 29 as unpatentable over Wagner and Hawkins, claims 8, 12, and 30
as unpatentable over Wagner, Hawkins, and Harada, and claims 21, 22, 24, and 25
as unpatentable over Hawkins and Harada is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
jlb
ROBERT GRAY
CONLEY, ROSE & TAYON, P.C.
P.O. Box 3267
Houston TX 77253-3267
21
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Last modified: September 9, 2013