Ex Parte Zhou et al - Page 7

                 Appeal 2007-0409                                                                                       
                 Application 10/479,203                                                                                 
                  (11) The thickness of the first boundary layer is preferably 0.5 to 10 nm.                            
                        [0039].                                                                                         
                  (12) The thickness of the second boundary layer is preferably 0.5 to 50 nm.                           
                        [0040].                                                                                         
                  (13) According to Nonaka, the boundary layer reduces deterioration due to                             
                        repeated overwriting.  [0018].                                                                  
                  (14) “The dielectric layers act to prevent the recording layer form [sic,                             
                        from] being deformed or opened during recording.”  [0004].                                      
                  (15) Nonaka teaches that Te alloys, including alloys of Ge, Sb, Te, and Sn                            
                        may be used as the recording layers in rewritable phase change type                             
                        optical recording media.  [0047] & [0050].  According to Nonaka, it is                          
                        known that Te alloys have a high crystallization rate and allow high                            
                        speed overwriting.  [0003].                                                                     
                  (16) According to Nonaka, known materials used as the dielectric layer in                             
                        contact with the recording layer include sulfides such as ZnS and a                             
                        mixture film of ZnS and SiO2.  [0005].                                                          
                                       ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS                                                         
                 Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112:                                                                      
                              Rejection of claims 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2                                  
                        Appellants do not contest the Examiner’s finding that claims 13 and                             
                 14 contain a typographical error (i.e., double recitation of the phrase                                
                 “transparent layer”) which renders these claims indefinite.  (Reply Br. 3).                            
                        Because it is uncontested, the rejection is summarily affirmed.                                 





                                                           7                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013