The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte M. MICHAEL PITTS, JR. AND RODRIGO V. ROMO ____________ Appeal 2007-0417 Application 10/796,814 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: May 11, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, all of the claims pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013