The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STANLEY E. KREHBIEL, JR., CAREY W. LEWIS,
WILLIAM A. HETRICK, and JOSEPH G. MOORE
____________
Appeal 2007-0426
Application 10/145,307
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: August 28, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from a final rejection of
claims 1, 3-9, 11-17, and 19-22, which are all of the claims pending in this
application, as claims 2, 10, and 18 have been canceled. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013